<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t say &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 06:46:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consultoría artesana en red &#187; Análisis del momento actual de la Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/comment-page-1#comment-215786</link>
		<dc:creator>Consultoría artesana en red &#187; Análisis del momento actual de la Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 06:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firasd.org/?p=87#comment-215786</guid>
		<description>[...] Muy interesante y completa la reflexión de Dion Hinchcliffe sobre el momento actual de la Web 2.0. A leer despacito y subrayar (claro, para eso tienes que imprimir y pasarte al mundo de los átomos). A ver si la Web 2.0 va a ser un bluff&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Muy interesante y completa la reflexión de Dion Hinchcliffe sobre el momento actual de la Web 2.0. A leer despacito y subrayar (claro, para eso tienes que imprimir y pasarte al mundo de los átomos). A ver si la Web 2.0 va a ser un bluff&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Unspoken &#187; Thursday Thirteen</title>
		<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/comment-page-1#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Unspoken &#187; Thursday Thirteen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firasd.org/?p=87#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>[...] 3.) Web 2.0. I really hate this phrase. If you are going to talk about it, be specific in what you are talking about, don&#039;t just label something Web 2.0 because it makes it sound cool. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3.) Web 2.0. I really hate this phrase. If you are going to talk about it, be specific in what you are talking about, don&#8217;t just label something Web 2.0 because it makes it sound cool. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Unspoken</title>
		<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/comment-page-1#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Unspoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firasd.org/?p=87#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>famfamfam.com: Icons CSS Based Navigation Mike Davidson -- sIFR 2.0: Rich Accessible Typography for the Masses Vitaly Friedman &#124; Blog: 25 Sites You Shouldn&#039;t Have Missed in 2005 O&#039;Reilly: What Is Web 2.0 Don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t say &#226;&#8364;&#732;Web 2.0&#226;&#8364;&amp;sup2; at firasd.org &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://leftunspoken.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>famfamfam.com: Icons CSS Based Navigation Mike Davidson &#8212; sIFR 2.0: Rich Accessible Typography for the Masses Vitaly Friedman | Blog: 25 Sites You Shouldn&#039;t Have Missed in 2005 O&#039;Reilly: What Is Web 2.0 Don&acirc;&euro;&trade;t say &acirc;&euro;&tilde;Web 2.0&acirc;&euro;&amp;sup2; at firasd.org <a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://leftunspoken.net" rel="nofollow">&lt;img src=&quot;</a><a href="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif&#038;quot" rel="nofollow">http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif&#038;quot</a>; align=&quot;right&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something Unpredicta</title>
		<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/comment-page-1#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>Something Unpredicta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firasd.org/?p=87#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>AJAX seems to be the number one &#226;&#8364;&#339; Web 2.0 &#226;&#8364;? obsession these days. It seems that along with the buzzwords come hundreds of ideas and even implementations of the most useless, redundant pieces of Javascript ever. So, here&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s my list of things Javascript should not be used for, just off the top&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://somethingunpredictable.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJAX seems to be the number one &acirc;&euro;&oelig; Web 2.0 &acirc;&euro;? obsession these days. It seems that along with the buzzwords come hundreds of ideas and even implementations of the most useless, redundant pieces of Javascript ever. So, here&acirc;&euro;&trade;s my list of things Javascript should not be used for, just off the top<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://somethingunpredictable.com" rel="nofollow">&lt;img src=&quot;</a><a href="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif&#038;quot" rel="nofollow">http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif&#038;quot</a>; align=&quot;right&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something Unpredictable &#187; What not to use AJAX for</title>
		<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/comment-page-1#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Something Unpredictable &#187; What not to use AJAX for</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firasd.org/?p=87#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>[...] AJAX seems to be the number one &#8220;Web 2.0&#8221; obsession these days. It seems that along with the buzzwords come hundreds of ideas and even implementations of the most useless, redundant pieces of Javascript ever. So, here&#8217;s my list of things Javascript should not be used for, just off the top of my head. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AJAX seems to be the number one &#8220;Web 2.0&#8221; obsession these days. It seems that along with the buzzwords come hundreds of ideas and even implementations of the most useless, redundant pieces of Javascript ever. So, here&#8217;s my list of things Javascript should not be used for, just off the top of my head. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick &#187; Web 2.0 Poetry</title>
		<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/comment-page-1#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick &#187; Web 2.0 Poetry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 10:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firasd.org/?p=87#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t Say &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t Say &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/comment-page-1#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 10:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firasd.org/?p=87#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>I so disagree. Look at Wikipedia&#039;s definition:

â€œWeb 2.0 refers to a perceived transition of the World Wide Web from a collection of websites to a full-fledged computing platform serving web applications to end users. The proponents of this thinking expect that ultimately Web 2.0 services will replace desktop computing applications for many purposes.â€?

That seems like one solid statement about the phenomenon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I so disagree. Look at Wikipedia&#8217;s definition:</p>
<p>â€œWeb 2.0 refers to a perceived transition of the World Wide Web from a collection of websites to a full-fledged computing platform serving web applications to end users. The proponents of this thinking expect that ultimately Web 2.0 services will replace desktop computing applications for many purposes.â€?</p>
<p>That seems like one solid statement about the phenomenon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://firasd.org/weblog/2005/10/08/web-20/comment-page-1#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 08:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firasd.org/?p=87#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Web 2.0 is as useless a term as Metrosexual.
NEITHER OF THEM MEAN ANYTHING, AND IT&#039;S A USELESS MEDIA DESCRIPTOR WORD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 is as useless a term as Metrosexual.<br />
NEITHER OF THEM MEAN ANYTHING, AND IT&#8217;S A USELESS MEDIA DESCRIPTOR WORD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

