B-Rate Nightmares

View 4 Comments »
Share |

I don’t remember most of my dreams. I don’t retell the ones I do remember, because we all know that dreams tend to be odd (and boring). I also think people pay way too much attention to dreams as ‘signals of the subconscious’, which I find silly: I dream about things that came to mind during the day or week, not necessarily things that I ‘care’ about. Plus I find dreams to be a bit Heisenbergish, in that the more concrete information I excavate from memory, the less certain I am that some particulars were actually experienced in the dream rather fabricated in reconstruction.

However, a streak of fitful nights has produced a couple dreams (one pointless, one a nightmare) that I remember way too vividly. And seeing Paul Ford write about dreaming in Java code—code!—reminds me that mine aren’t all that weird. The first: I was at some sort of customs checkpoint filling out stupid forms, and listening to the administering agent talk to some people about politics. ‘Separation of Powers’, he was telling them, is absolutely ‘essential for a democratic country’. In actual life when someone says that, I’d just be skeptical, but in the dream I wanted to sock him in the face for being an idiot. His clueless exegesis didn’t stop there: he was talking about the nascent Iraqi state, and decided to prove his point by pulling examples from the Ottoman Empire, and then, of all things, Alexander the Great. I then realized that the idiotic questions I was filling out (biographical information about my mother’s youth, etc.) were actually optional ‘sponsored’ questions from TV shows, seeking character backgrounds for story ideas! So I put a spiteful red X through all of the optional blocks and handed the form in.

A cynical Jungian might proffer that, especially in light of the next dream (into which he’d read ‘alienation’), customs agents babbling stupidly while handing out government forms sponsored by TV shows is basically what I think of America, heh. But it isn’t. I think the early psychoanalysts did us a big disservice by their fetishistic devotion to ‘Freudian slips’ and the like. I mean, there’s enough to sieve through in the sea of conscious thought that grasping at straws of subconscious indicators seems pointless. And dangerous, as with quack therapists who conjure up ‘repressed memories‘ of nonexistent childhood abuse. In any case, since I can’t help but notice the irony in talking unqualifiedly about psychology after ranting about dumb political lectures, let’s move on.

The only nightmares I really remember are from childhood, but they were as much ‘adventures’ as nightmares: running down stairs as blood swept onto the tiles behind us, or waking up just before getting killed by a sword, even dying once, at the hands of a fluttering killer bat. Then there was a flood of red, fading to black, with a low-digit number suspended in view. I don’t think too much about the afterlife, but I suppose it’ll be somewhat anticlimatic if all we get on the other side is a flood of red and a final darkness.

This particular nightmare—rather, series of nightmares—had to do with my street having suddenly ‘vanished’. I was lost, couldn’t get home, everyone was confused, nothing was right. Some people were still human, many were ghouls. It was a series of vignettes, and after each one ended I’d be like ‘ok, I was dreaming then, it’s all sane now’, or ‘wow that sucked, but at least I escaped’, only to to run into things like a sympathetic soul who was agreeing with me, sitting on a desk to my right, suddenly disfiguring into a monster. Then more screaming, more running, more isolation.

I only remember one of these vignettes well, probably because it was one of the more ‘adventurous’ ones. I walked into a bar and leaned over a partition to ask a lady what the way home was. Her face was painted to look just like Frankenstein: green skin, hollow jowls, the works. She was so soft spoken that the first time I said “excuse me” I didn’t hear the reply. So I said “excuse me” again, and she nodded vigourously, mouthing softly to ask what I wanted. Sitting across from her, a scrawny guy with a high pitched voice asked another person at the table, “Do you ever think that maybe I look like a total badass sometimes?” Scrawny high-pitch was covered in green tattoos. She told me the path home and I left, but it didn’t occur to me to wonder why she was painted like a monster—there’s no accounting for taste, you know?

I somehow hitched a ride home, sitting in front with the driving man’s female companion between us. We rolled onto the street and it had indeed vanished: people were wandering around puzzledly, also looking for their houses, stumbling with weak backs. The air was misty, like there had just been a poison gas attack. Driving around confusedly, we stopped and stared at a pale yellow teardrop in the sky. Somehow, we suddenly realized that it was a scout for the ‘other side’. Now the teardrop started attacking us. It almost shattered our windshield by throwing a big blob of yellowish sap. We couldn’t speed past our assailant because the teardrop was somehow holding our car still, so it kept spasmatically flinging sap at us. The woman had almost lost her mind from shrieking bloody murder. The view was a bit like scenes from the Jurassic Park movie: dark night, reflectively illuminated glass, breaths heavy with uncertainty and fear. The teardrop ceased spraying for a bit, and I was fervently hoping that we weren’t going to be hit with another big blob that would finally break our windshield—but the resumed spraying was still just light. Except the liquid was now blood.

Our windshield was being sprayed with dark red trickling blood.

This left us rather alarmed.

Finally we were able to move—in reverse. But slowly, at about walking speed. And because we didn’t have enough problems yet, a skeleton with a machete began stalking us from the front, approaching the driver’s side, swinging for our windshield. We found ourselves backed into a huge group of people, or ‘beings’ if not people. Finally, normality! Someone yelled ‘kill them!’ The masses of our helpers were going to crush our assaulters like bugs. But guess who ‘them’ was? Us! So now we had a sap-flinging teardrop, a machete-bearing skeleton, and an army of random attackers after our battered car. A couple of large mechanical beings, striped in black and white, starting stomping towards us, gunning for our windsheild with god-knows-what. To top off the campiness, bad industrial music started playing in the background. I don’t recall what happened next—given the slight mismatch, not knowing is probably best.

I must say, I’m disappointed at the cinematic amateurishness of my ‘subconscious mind’. Women in Frankenstein masks, sky-suspended popping whiteheads, animated skeletons ripped off ‘Pirates of The Caribbean’, killer robots out of Japanese animation studios and an inexplicably crippled vehicle? Come on.

For what it’s worth, I do believe that the best horror fiction deals with this ‘world turned against me’ aspect, such as two stories I can’t remember the titles to, some parts of ‘The Excorcism of Emily Rose’, and to an extent, ‘lost in the wilderness’ movies like Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Wolf Creek, perhaps Hostel, etc.

(Speaking of Hostel, Lance Arthur guts it in an amusing ‘review’.)

PS. While on the topic of horror: I walked onto a subway carriage the other day to see a girl holding, between her thighs, a woman’s severed head. Jeez, how realistic do they make cosmetician’s models these days? Too realistic!

Related posts:

  1. T.Rex’s Dreams
             Click image for the full Dinosaur Comics strip. (Speaking...

  • http://canistorpedis.net/ thetorpedodog

    I used to have crappy nightmares pretty often. One frequent one when I was far younger involved being chased by a tornado, or being trapped in gym class. I don't have dreams anywhere near as much now, and they're really unmemorable.

  • http://firasd.org Firas

    Dave and I had an interesting conversation about the whole 'subconscious' deal:

    Dave:

    btw, methink you badly underestimate the important of dreams and subconscious expression…

    Firas:

    do tell. i mean, coming across a soft-spoken woman in a frankenstein mask? not even a freud-jung mindmeld can say that signifies anything sane.

    Dave:

    if dreams were sane and transparent metaphors for obvious daylight though processes… they would no longer be your subconscious.

    Firas:

    So you *can't* relate between a subconscious thought and conscious happenings? i thought that was the whole point (hidden desire, primal concerns, mixes of past happenings and future anxiety)

    Firas:

    er, whole point among the 'dreams are signals of subconscious' camp

    Dave:

    people tend to stupidly equate "subconscious" with "oh gee, I hadn't thought of that on first thought". The whole point of subconscious is that you don't really think of it… without getting all cheap sci-fi on you, the mere fact that you'd immediately consider a "rationale" for certain dreams, is usually a clear sign this is not coming from your subconscious, but you very conscious self trying to auto-suggest something…

    Firas:

    i guess i'm too turned off by the whole history of moron therapists planting fake suggestions under hypnosis in their 'repressed memory' patients

    Dave:

    well, the whole thing is that, in order to stand a chance, you'd either need to be incredibly scientifically minded and cold as ice, or helped by a neutral third party.

    Dave:

    a middle-ground is to write down all experiences and trying to read them alone or with somebody else, later on…

    Dave:

    don't get me wrong, Freud and Jung were both libidinous nature freaks… doesn't mean they were wrong… from a pure neuroscience POV, you'd be very narrow-minded not to admit a correlation between your brain's underlying activity and dreams..

    Firas:

    like i said in the entry, i'm a political science person, not a psychology person, so my 'subconscious-bashing' is mostly uninformed :p

    Dave:

    I tend to despise psy (and psy scholars most of all) even more than you possibly could.

    Dave:

    yet, I guess I somewhat agree with the objective neuroscientific approach. which meets with psy on a few points there.

    Firas:

    i like psych for what it has given us in terms of things like cognitive behavioural therapy as a substitute (or complement) for treating every issue with meds, etc. so its 'hard science' practitioners definitely add to knowledge, but its philosophers, as you say, are out there

    Dave:

    from a purely "rational" POV (i.e. not based on the libidinous elucubrations of some cigar-smoking schlock), one can easily infer the existence of different "layers" of consciousness… that's the whole idea behind most of neuroscience and cog. sci.

    Dave:

    philosophers are on the fence.

    Firas:

    oh i definitely don't disagree that there *is* a subconscious–just doubt the benefit of groping around in it to make sense of things

    Dave:

    some, like Freud, if one can call him so, have joyously jumped off the fence and into the realm of unfounded claims…

    Dave:

    but take Wittgenstein, or other math/logic/cog.sci guys: the whole holistic approach to consciousness requires the existence of lower layer such as the subconsious…

    Dave:

    one can simply view "subconscious" as one of the layer between your purely biological organism and the holistic representation of your brain i.e. your conscious…

    Firas:

    like what's called 'soul' in common usage?

    Dave:

    in that, listening to it is about as important as listening to the hum of your computer's fan might be, if you want to keep running software for a long time…

    Dave:

    err… "soul" is a much murkier concept… unless you come from Memphis and can sing across 5 octaves.

  • http://love-unlimited.net Kassad

    First of all, I am glad that you are "on air" again, even you have made a short appearence on the wp-forum as well.

    I missed you as one of the sharpest mind ever, I have met there :)

    It was amusing to read your post about nightmares and more so the discussion about it.

    In your story, you avoided a more close explanation of your dreams so that means for me that you just keep it private.

    As to your discussion:

    If you do not mind my chiming in then I would say that I keep psychology a true science.

    Even though, I too think that Freud's obsession with "phallos" and "motherfucking" were very much farfetched, he still was the creator of a modern science.

    I too, have dreams, either when sleeping or when awake :)

    I learned to keep my conclusions at bay.

    Sometimes, I was able to make connection between previous happenings and certain elements of a dream but I alwasy thought it superfluous to think about it seriously. Psychology is too young and just at the beginning in the exploration of human soul to draw hasty conclusions.

    And psychologists themselves are mostly not up to their own profession, as well.

    American psychologists are the worst, in my opinion, because for them, it is a living so they should make it to look big :)

    I am very scientifically minded ( a bit by bit man) but at the same time very sensitive.

    This may seem as far from each other as if they had their position at the opposite ends of a rod.

    Though, if you twist the rod around in a circle the two opposite ends will just meet and coexist.

    Also, I am a big believer of the Occam's Razor principle.

    If I feel the bounderies of my capacity in understanding things, there I will stop.

    Otherwise, there would only be a burned out field of dilemmas in my soul.

    I understand frustration, the pain of soul, fear and uncertainty.

    And I advocate suffer, endurance and trust. (all in one)

    Well, I was a bit farfeched by myself, too :)

    For the sake of correctness, I must state that I do know good American psychologist though.

    Dr. M. Scott Peck, whose book – The Road Less Travelled – is just a perfect example of the real science of psychology.

    Also, there was a really interesting science-fiction novel by Stanislaw Lem in the seventies. There, he described a scientific experiment where complete human souls were recorded on vinyl-like medium and just like the turntables, pickups read the tracks that represented individual lifes. Sometimes the pickups jumped erroneously and gave some kind of prescience if they jumped forward or resulted in some kind of ESP effect if they jumped to another individuals disk. Kind of, they dreamed one anothers life as the whole setup may be considered a dream, as well.

    Sometimes, we know that we were dreaming because we ate too much.

    Sometimes, we can idenfify some elements of real happenings in our dreams.

    Sometimes, we just do not know what and why we dream but more or less we are somehow conscious participants in our dreams. That, I experienced many times. In some way, we are the directors of our own "dream-films".

    But in the morning I wake up and I always choose to stay on the ground firmly with both foot.

  • http://firasd.org Firas

    Kassad: thanks for the kind words. And yeah, I didn't go too much into personal thoughts, because this is a general public site—I imagine if I was writing in, say, a friends-only livejournal I might have mentioned that I was walking around extremely tensed and anxious at the time of the aforementioned fitful nights.

    I agree with you that different dreams are produced by and signify different things; what I took away from my conversation with Dave is that demanding a concrete connection between dreams and core daylight concerns as a prerequisite for holding dreams as meaningful may be a mistaken demand.

    I have much respect for psychology and psychologists in general, including Freud and his contemporaries. I just think that, as far as explaining dreams is concerned, it's like reading literature: just because one person has a particular interpretation and another person has a different interpretation doesn't mean that one is more 'correct'. Maybe if you have the same 'motif' occur again and again in a dream you can pin it down to a sort of inner conflict. I don't know; besides not knowing much about historical theories in psychology, I also don't know much about dreams in general—what types of dreams people have, whether different sorts of people have had the same types of dreams, the contexts in which people have seen recurring motifs in dreams, et cetera.

    But saying, for example, that 'tall buildings signify such-and-such, a burning tree signifies such-and-such'—I think it's wrong to generalize like that, because we know that even colours have different meanings in different cultures, so holding the meaning of specific symbols as universally constant across individual imaginations almost veers into pseudoscience like astrology, numerology, etc: straining to find connections in the coincidental.